Today, Spar & Bernstein tax attorney Sean Chi take his turn on the hot seat with the famous Inside the Actors Studio-Bernard Pivot questionnaire:

What is your favorite word?

Yes.

What is your least favorite word?

No.

What turns you on creatively, spiritually or emotionally?

The right music at the right time. Or bags of money.

What turns you off?

Butterflies. I’m not the only one.

What is your favorite curse word?

Golly-gosh-darn-it.

What sound or noise do you love?

A dog barking.

What sound or noise do you hate?

Metal on metal.

What profession other than your own would you like to attempt?

Sport columnist or novelist.

What profession would you not like to do?

Fox News reporter.

If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the Pearly Gates?

All dogs do go to heaven.

 

Outside Our Windows: AFL-CIO Rally over Financial Reform

On April 29, 2010, in News, by BradBernstein

The police are out in force. Tons of people are clustering around City Hall Park. And the music is blaring, the Rocky theme and “Get ready, ’cause here I come.”

Right outside our window, activists organized by the AFL-CIO are getting ready to rally about financial regullatory reform, calling for “Wall Street accountability, the creation of good jobs now, and an end to predatory lending practices.”

Organizers say they expect some 10,000 protesters to gather in City Hall Park, where AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka, who’s been all over the news shows these days, and others will address the crowd.

 

WASHINGTON, DC – A document entitled “Proposed conceptual immigration” is circulating on Capitol Hill, detailing the main points of future immigration bill.

The 26-page document obtained by La Opinion, is backed by Sens. Charles Schumer ( D-NY ), Robert Menendez ( D-NJ ) and Harry Reid ( D-NV ). The first point of the proposal is entitled “secure the border before taking any action to change the status of people living illegally in the United States.”

“We need clear benchmarks to ensure the border and ultimately deal effectively with the millions of illegal immigrants in the country. These must be met before taking action to adjust the status of persons who are illegally in the country, “he says.

“This must include: increasing the number of border patrols, increasing the ICE agents to combat trafficking, ICE inspectors enhance, extend the number of ICE officials for fraud detection, increasing staff at ports of entry, improve technology and infrastructure to assist border patrol, increasing resources to indict traffickers and increase resources for immigration courts, which expedite the removal of individuals who are illegally in the country, “the document continues.

It also mentions that after the implementation of the proposal will create a bipartisan commission will be tasked with investigating the state of security in the northern and southern borders and provide recommendations for additional resources, technology and infrastructure that must be implemented to ensure operational control complete the boundary within a year.

Democrats have insisted on finding Republican support, which was thwarted this week when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) publicly withdrew their support for a proposal this year.

Other Republicans who have been contacted by Schumer have argued that it can support anything until I see something “in writing”, a factor which until now had not been provided.

In this regard, sources on Capitol Hill Democrats, described the document as an effort to get Republican support for a bill.

“Although it is supported only by Democrats, is a bipartisan effort, which aims to make it difficult for Republicans to say no. Its purpose is to find the necessary support, “said Frank Sharry, executive director of Voice Americas to La Opinion.

The document also specifies that after 18 months, the Social Security Administration will begin to issue biometric identification cards. “Among other features this tool would have features like the ability to check an individual locally without requiring that each employee accessing the biometric database,” among others.

Five years after the date of implementation of the proposed ID card would serve as the only acceptable document for employment verification.

In the area of probate, the document proposes a “prospective legal status” ( LPI ), as mentioned by the Opinion / Impremedia in March, “that will allow undocumented immigrants and those who are benefited by the TPS , travel and work in the USA. After eight years, would be given residence.

The proposal has a position in favor of unions, authorizing the creation of a commission in the area of future flow of workers.

 

Source: Immigration Policy Center

Washington, D.C. – Supporters of Arizona’s harsh new immigration law claim that it is, in part, a crime-fighting measure. However, people like Republican State Senator Russell Pearce of Mesa, the bill’s author, overlook two salient points: crime rates have already been falling in Arizona for years despite the presence of unauthorized immigrants, and a century’s worth of research has demonstrated that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes or be behind bars than the native-born.

Furthermore, while much has been made about kidnappings in Arizona, law-enforcement officials indicate that most of these involve drug and human smugglers, as well as smuggled immigrants themselves – not the general population of the state.

The Immigration Policy Center releases a fact sheet which shows the decrease in Arizona crime rates over time. The fact sheet also indicates that states with high immigration have the lowest crime rates and that unauthorized immigration is not associated with higher crime rates.

Highlights include:

* According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, violent crimes in Arizona fell from 512 per 100,000 people in 2005 to 447 per 100,000 people in 2008, the last year for which data is available.

* According to a 2008 report from the conservative Americas Majority Foundation, crime rates are lowest in states with the highest immigration growth rates, such as Arizona. From 1999 to 2006, the total crime rate declined 13.6 percent in the 19 highest-immigration states (including Arizona), compared to a 7.1 percent decline in the other 32 states.

* Although the unauthorized immigrant population doubled to about 12 million from 1994 to 2004, data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics indicates that the violent crime rate in the United States declined by 35.1 percent during this time and the property crime rate fell by
25.0 percent.

Combating crime related to human smuggling requires more trust between immigrants and the police, not less. Yet the undermining of trust between police and the community is precisely what Arizona’s new law accomplishes.

In the final analysis, immigration policy is not an effective means of addressing crime because the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals.

 

By Mariana Vazquez Garcia
Head Immigration Attorney, The Law Offices of Spar & Bernstein

Arizona’s new immigration law has triggered different emotions in me, including feelings of outright protest.

At times, I am livid.

At other moments, I am positively offended.

And yet other times, I am hopeful.

I’m livid at the hypocrisy of the Arizona politicians and their supporters. I’m offended that the governor says she will not tolerate racial profiling in her state, yet must know full well that is exactly what will happen – if it doesn’t already. But I’m hopeful that at the very least economic problems will be sure to follow in Arizona and that they will be well deserved. I’m hopeful that the challenges filed against that piece of garbage will prevail and that the federal government will finally work in passing a good immigration law .

I’m hopeful that maybe this economic woe will teach at least some that it is not easy to run businesses, to clean houses or offices, to do their own landscaping, to do their own cooking, to run restaurants, to serve on others, etc. Just because Latinos go quietly about their work, it does not mean that our work is less important than anyone else contributing to this country.

I’m hopeful that maybe some will finally learn or accept that their home state – as well as the rest of the country, for that matter – was built by the hard work of illegal immigrants (all the way back to the Pilgrims), some who have been able to legalize their status and others who simply dream of the chance to do so all the while working jobs no one will take, working hours no one else will work, working harder than those with legal status, and always working for the greater benefit of those with status and in power rather than for themselves.

I do understand the need and desire to halt people from crossing into this land, but the Arizona law does nothing to prevent that from happening.

Instead, it is now open season on Latinos, legal or not, in Arizona.

So, I join the boycott of Arizona and hope for a better life for us all!

 

For months, we’ve pleaded, begged with controversial fillmaker Michael Moore to do a documentary on immigration. And last night, on CNN’s Larry King Live, Moore finally admitted to Larry that he’s indeed considered it. “I’ve thought a lot about it…because we’re all immigrants,” he said.

Hip hip hooray!

 

From: Bindhu Vijayan
Immigration Attorney, The Law Offices of Spar & Bernstein

I’m part of a South Asian progressive action group and Arizona’s new immigration law, SB1070, has been a hot topic of discussion.

Here are a couple of things you can do to voice opposition:

1) Write/ or call Gov. Jan Brewer’s office with this message: “I am deeply disappointed that you have signed SB1070. This law promotes discrimination and profiling by legitimizing suspicion based upon appearance. I ask that this law be rescinded immediately.” Her office can be reached at (602) 542-4331 or azgov@az.gov.

2) Rally this Saturday May 1: One of the reasons SB1070 passed is because the Federal Government has not addressed our broken immigration system. Please join the prominent immigrants rights groups in NYC for a rally this Saturday, May 1, 10:30 AM-1:00pm, at Foley Square – Worth Street (between Centre & Lafayette Streets), calling for comprehensive immigration reform.

 

Source: Center for American Progress
http://www.americanprogress.org

Angela Kelley on Arizona’s New Immigration Law

The text:

What’s going on in Arizona?

Last Friday, the governor of Arizona signed into law a sweeping measure that would basically empower state and local police to arrest anybody that they have a reasonable suspicion is an illegal immigrant. It’s a sweeping law, it’s a law that’s going to cost Arizona a lot of money, it’s a law that’s probably unconstitutional, and frankly makes Arizona the most hostile state in the United States for not only immigrants but a third of Arizona’s population that happens to be Hispanic.

What does this mean for immigrants and nonimmigrants in Arizona?

What this law means for immigrants and nonimmigrants and Latinos and foreign-born in Arizona is that they’re going to feel like they have a target on their back – a bull’s-eye, if you will. It’s going to be so that police can, at any time they come across you, ask you for papers. They can ask you to show that you were born in this country. They’re the kind of documents that most of us, frankly, don’t carry around. And for people who look foreign, who may speak with an accent, who may listen to a radio station that may be blaring from their car that’s in a different language are likely to get pulled over and they’re likely to have to ask to show papers. It’s very un-American, it’s also very unconstitutional, it’s very likely to get challenged in the courts and cost Arizona a lot of money. And for a state that’s already $3 billion in the hole, it doesn’t seem like a wise use of the citizens of Arizona’s resources.

What does it mean for national comprehensive immigration reform?

I think what the Arizona law means for national immigration reform is that Congress has to act. Look, this is a shot that’s been heard around the country, and that’s ringing in lawmakers’ ears. It’s very clear that we’re not going to stop illegal immigration by empowering the police to arrest anyone who looks foreign. It’s really clear that we’re not going to have control of our borders by permitting police to go after folks just because they have an accent. It’s really clear that until we crack down on employers who are hiring people without papers, until we ensure that people are coming with visas and not smugglers, and until we make sure that people register, pay taxes, and come out of the shadows, we’re not going to have control of our problem of a broken immigration system. Those are important measures that Arizona simply cannot do. It’s not within the state’s power to pass sweeping immigration reform – it is within Congress’s power. So we can expect, sadly, that other small Arizona measures are likely to pop up in counties and in cities across the country – perhaps in other states. And as long as that continues we’re going to have a broken immigration system, we’re going to have illegal immigration, and what we really need are the feds to act. This is why lawmakers are elected into office: to solve some tough problems. So what they need to do is pass reform, make sure people are required to register and pay taxes, that employers get on the right side of the law, and that they pay their taxes, and that we know who’s coming to this country and if they’re the kind of folks we want to have here.

 

Just for a moment, let’s try to lower our blood pressure over Arizona’s putrid new immigration law, SB1070 – or as we call it around here, SunuvaBitch 1070 – and consider a positive.

That’s right – a positive.

Maybe this is exactly what comprehensive immigration reform 2010 really needed.

Maybe this is actually a tilting point.

Maybe, just maybe, we’ll look back on all this 10, 20, 30 years from now and be utterly thankful for Arizona’s neanderthal law galvanizing, like nothing else before, the pro-immigrant cause and the push for immigration reform.

I mean, hasn’t it done that already?

And we’re only at the beginning of the dark things to come this summer.

Wait until the 49 other states experience all those federal resources being sucked right down the Grand Canyon, with Arizona needing to beef up its staffing to help jail all those rounded-up undocumented aliens – an estimated 460,000 of them.

Wait until we experience the bitter backlash, when we witness on a grand scale the pure ugliness of racial profiling, when we see the lust for illegals lead to the illegality of unreasonable search and seizures, when our well-up eyes watching the news of this are forced to close because we can’t stand our own inhumanity anymore.

This new law will indeed shine a stark light on how abysmally our country handles the issue of immigration and the problem of the undocumented. It will show, with its egregious unconstitutionality, how busted a system we truly have.

So, guess what?

The end result could be the opposite of what Sheriff Joe, Gov. Brewer, and their ilk so desperately want.

It could lead to the type of national outrage we felt over 40 years, when the lynching of three activists in Mississippi compelled us to quickly bring about the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

So, for a moment, let’s seriously think about that.

Let’s consider the positive here.

Maybe this is a blessing in disguise after all.

 

arizonalawIs Arizona making a run for this title of ignobility: The Most Racist State in the U.S.?

It’s a question that definitely needs to be asked now, with the passing of SB1070 on top of its already sordid history.

I mean, take a look:

1) Arizona was one of the last states to observe Martin Luther King Day, to where the National Football League, which had an increasing percentage of African American players, voted to yank 1993′s Super Bowl XXVII from Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe and awarded it instead to the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. (Faced with a boycott, Arizona voters finally approved the holiday by ballot in 1992, and on March 23, 1993, the NFL awarded the 1996 Super Bowl XXX to Tempe.)

2) Arizona emboldens a crusty, creepy, crackpot like Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who proclaims himself America’s Toughest Sheriff – a guy who revels in dressing up inmates in pink underwear, endorses such things as tent cities for prisoners in the dead of desert summers, and thinks progress in law enforcement is going back to the days of chain gangs. Not to mention his absolute obsession with rounding up – with total impunity – anyone suspected of being an illegal immigrant, to where seemingly anyone darker than himself is a reasonable target.

3) Arizona Governor Jan Brewer last week signs into law the anti-immigrant SB1070, which only further breaks an egregiously broken immigration system. It encourages, among other ugly things, racial profiling as well as a show-me-your-papers-or-else police state where immigrants unable to produce documents showing they are allowed to be in the U.S. could be arrested, jailed for up to six months and fined $2,500.

Way to go, Arizona!

You’re well on your way to winning a title no state in the union should ever want to win.

So, we wonder: What’s next on the agenda?

Waterboarding anyone with an accent?

Huh?

Shame on you.